Thursday, January 29, 2009

TLT 470 - Week 2

This week, we were given a few tasks to accomplish.

Assn #1

The first task was to complete a webquest, and I decided to work on one called "THE LOST FOOD PYRAMID." This webquest was created to teach young children about nutrition and health. It was well structured and promoted group collaboration. It also applied to something that the children could understand, and it used both technical (web research) and non-technical learning (ie, drawing, coloring, writing, etc.).

Assn #2
For the second assignment, I completed an inquiry called "What Makes Plants Grow?" from http://wise.berkeley.edu. This project takes students through informational steps to teach them about plant life and what is required to sustain life. Throughout the steps, students were taken to multiple resources on the web to learn more about each section. They were then able to make notes at each step to highlight key points for the end of the project.

Assn #3
Surveys were the topic of the third assignment. I created the the following survey on surveymonkey.com:

http://www.surveymonkey.com/s.aspx?sm=TMsHoxFDJi1MjwkspwTjcQ_3d_3d

Based on the responses from my group, it appears that many students may be exploring, are not being explored by those that teach them. I'm not sure how this compares to a larger survey base, but it is often beneficial to use tools that people already know how to use. The one exception to this in my survey is question #2. It seems that many people are using various collaboration tools for data exchange.

Page: Carly's TLT 470 Survey Questions
1. Where do you check your E-mail most often?

Response
Percent
Response
Count
Personal computer
50.0% 3
Work computer
16.7% 1
Smart Phone/PDA
33.3% 2
I don't check my E-mail
0.0%

0


2. Which of the following collaboration tools have you heard of or used?

Response
Percent
Response
Count
Google Apps
83.3% 5
SharePoint
50.0% 3
Zoho
0.0% 0
Blackboard
100.0% 6
Moodle
50.0% 3
N/A
0.0%

0


3. Do you gather information and relevant materials related to technology or your field of work from any of the following?

Response
Percent
Response
Count
RSS Feed
50.0% 3
Listserv
33.3% 2
Blogs
66.7% 4
N/A
16.7% 1
Other (please list below)
33.3% 2
If so, which do you use most and why?

2


4. Do you communicate using any of the following services, and if so, with who?
Students Colleagues Friends Family Response
Count
Myspace 0.0% (0) 0.0% (0) 100.0% (2) 100.0% (2) 2
Facebook 0.0% (0) 66.7% (2) 100.0% (3) 66.7% (2) 3
Friendfeed 0.0% (0) 100.0% (1) 0.0% (0) 0.0% (0) 1
Twitter 0.0% (0) 50.0% (1) 50.0% (1) 0.0% (0) 2
Second Life 0.0% (0) 0.0% (0) 100.0% (1) 0.0% (0) 1
Other 0.0% (0) 50.0% (1) 100.0% (2) 0.0% (0) 2
N/A 100.0% (2) 100.0% (2) 100.0% (2) 100.0% (2)

Thursday, January 22, 2009

TQ#1

Although, the Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPCK) framework contrasts the ideals discussed in Jonassen, et al's discussion of Meaningful Learning, they both attempt to achieve the same result of successful integration of technology into the classroom. Throughout both works, two significantly different approaches are discussed. The one common denominator that is continually emphasized is the fact that technology alone is not the answer to a successful and fruitful learning environment. As Jonassen stated, "Technologies are lousy teachers but they can be powerful tools to think with." (p. 10)

Koehler & Mishra have a very structured and methodical view into the complexity of integrating technology in the classroom. The understanding of three key concepts (content knowledge, pedagogical knowledge, and technological knowledge) are integral to the writers' theories about how technology works and fails in the classroom. They discuss these concepts in depth, and describe the necessity to understand and grasp the knowledge behind all of the concepts in order to merge them into a balanced plan, and achieve an effective learning experience. In the TPCK framework, detailed analysis and assessment of the content, the method of teaching, and the integration of technology are essential. After reading this text, I questioned what the role of the student was in this framework.

Jonassen, et al has an approach that promotes clever and original ways to aid learning in the classroom. They also discuss some key concepts important to their theories, which include active, constructive, cooperative, authentic and intentional activities. (p. 2) With this strategy, teachers are encouraged to think outside the box and find inventive ways to use technology as a tool or resource to engage students in the learning process. Students are given the opportunity to think for themselves and "foster meaningful learning" (p. 8) through the uses of technology. The focus on meaningful learning also stresses the importance of sharing knowledge in a group or social setting. This allows the students the opportunity to express different perspectives on the topics being discussed, and learn not only from their teachers, but also from their peers.

The primary difference I observed in these readings is the focus of information. Koehler and Mishra emphasize best practices to share complex knowledge, while Jonassen, et al looks at the student and how they interpret the methods used to pass on the knowledge. Both seem to be important pieces to consider when deciding which methods and tools are best in different environments. In a scenario where it is important for everyone to grasp certain knowledge and information, the TPCK framework would work well with its structured and specific methods of teaching. However, this theory may not be successful in an environment where creativity and opinions facilitate learning rather than a single solution. The concepts from Jonassen, et al would be better suited for something of that nature. Ultimately, technology can be applied and assist in many scenarios, but in much different ways.

Without having much experience in the educational realm, a lot of what is described in these works is quite foreign to me. However, I think everyone can identify in one way or another with what these authors are discussing. With my primary experience being in the technical field, the use of technology to teach as well as learn is a common theme in my day. Theories such as these can assist with teaching and learning by way of technology if approached correctly. It is important to not only consider the content when deciding how to teach, but you must also consider the audience, and the different ways in which people learn.